Cortando el Queque

Cortando el Queque

  1. Justicia es divertida
    1. Todos comienzan en la misma página
    2. La transparencia genera confianza
    3. Creación de equipos
    4. Motivación derivada de la igualdad de capacidad para obtener equidad

Ejemplo: La fundadora y líder de los Grunts, Jane Egon, es e

mpleada a tiempo completo en Big Tech Corp. Un día, una gran idea se ocurre a Egon para una nueva aplicación de widgets tecnológicos para compartir fotos que cambiará el mundo de las aplicaciones para siempre.  Egon pasa aproximadamente 1 hora por día hábil durante un año investigando su mercado y finalmente decide organizar una nueva empresa.  Egon es sola una gerente intermedia, por lo que no puede permitirse contratar empleados o contratos independientespara hacer realidad su sueño.  Egon busca formas de recaudar fondos y justo cuando está a punto de perder la esperanza se encuentra con el libro Slicing Pie. “¡Finalmente una solución! Esto es brillante”, piensa Egon.

Egon es muy apasionada y persuasiva sobre su visión y por eso no tiene problemas para comunicar su idea de manera efectiva a cuatro empresarios tecnológicos experimentados a quienes convence para que se unan al equipo como Grunts A, B, C y D. Debido a que a Egon se le ocurrió la idea, Egon optó por aislar 51% del capital para sí misma para mantener una participación mayoritaria en la nueva empresa y no participar en el Fondo Grunt. Los cuatro grunts trabajan por una tarifa de recursos por hora de Grunt de $150 / h.

Debido a que su trabajo se volvió estresante y ya posee el 51% de la empresa, Egon dedica aproximadamente 1 hora por semana durante el año a recaudar una ronda semilla de capital.  Egon convence a un amigo rico para que contribuya con $500,000 por el 20% de la compañía y se produce la división del Fondo Grunt.  Egon y los Grunts comparte del capital de la compañía en el momento de la división del fondo Grunt que se desglosa de la siguiente manera:

Egoísta

Tarifa de recursos por hora de Grunt:            N/A

Entradas individuales:                                     N/A (honorarios legales pagados y tarifa de organización llc)

Cuota de miembros:                                       51%

Grunts A, B, C y D

Tarifa de recursos por hora de Grunt =          $150/h ($75/h x 2)

Aportes de los miembros:                              1043.5 horas ($156,525.00 valor por Grunt)

Total de entradas:                                          4,174 = ($626,100.00)

Cada acción de miembro:                               12.25% (Nota: 49% de la compañía está sujeta al Fondo Grunt)

 

En el ejemplo anterior, cada uno de los Grunts tendría derecho a un pago de Renuncia por Buena Razón de $156,525.00. Debido a que Egon solo recaudó $500k, la compañía no puede pagar el valor Renuncia por Buena Razón de cada Grunt. Si cada Grunt hubiera recibido una compensación durante la existencia del Fondo Grunt en lugar de participar en el Fondo Grunt, cada Grunt habría recibido $75/h o $78,262.50 en total. Debido a que Egon aisló el 51% de la propiedad para sí misma, cada Grunt recibe una participación diluida del 10% en la compañía recién financiada y la propiedad se desglosa de la siguiente manera:

 

Valoración post-dinero:                                  $2.5 millones ($500,000.00 / 20%)

Valoración pre-dinero:                                    $2 millones

Valor de las acciones del inversor:                 $500k o 20%

Valor de las acciones de Egon:                        $ 1.02 millones o 41%

Valor de propiedad de Grunt:                         $240k o 10%

Aunque el ejemplo anterior podría no verse tan mal a primera vista, recuerde que Egon apenas contribuyó a la construcción de la empresa, sin embargo, todavía posee un interés mayoritario después de una inversión de $500,000 y 4,174 horas de trabajo de Grunt.  Para obtener una mejor imagen, considere este escenario con Egon haciendo un GHRR alto sin las garantías de capital. En el siguiente ejemplo, Egon está contribuyendo al pastel en la cantidad de 261 horas por año a un GHRR de $350/h.

Egoísta

Tarifa de recursos por hora de Grunt:            $350/h

Aportes de los miembros:                              522 horas ($182,700)               

Gruñido A, B, C y D

Tarifa de recursos por hora de Grunt =          $150/h ($75 / h x 2)

Aportes de los miembros:                              1043.5 horas ($156,525.00 valor por Grunt)

Totales a partir de la división de Grunt Fund

Total de entradas:                                           $808,800 (4,696 horas)

 Participación de Egon:                                    22.6% ($182,700 / $808,800)            

Grunt Shares:                                                  19.4% ($156,525.00/$808,800)

Valoración pre-dinero:                                   $2 millones

 

Después de la división de Grunt Fund

Valoración post-dinero:                                  $2.5 millones ($500,000.00/20%)

Valor de las acciones del inversor:                 20% ($ 500k)

Valor de las acciones de Egon:                        18.0% ($450k)

Valor de propiedad de Grunt:                        15.5% ($ 387.5k cada uno)

  1. Atracción de talento
    1. Rendimientos decrecientes
    2. Incapacidad para ampliar el equipo

El impacto financiero solo comienza a contar la historia de cómo Egon ha afectado negativamente a la empresa.

En las semanas antes de la inversión de $500,000, la motivación de los Grunts comenzó a calmarse. A pesar del arduo trabajo constante de los Grunts, el interés protegido de Egon creó un techo verdadero. Cada uno de los Grunts se opuso a trabajar largas semanas por poca ganancia, mientras que Egon solo trabajaba una hora a la semana para mantener su interés.  Egon fue muy afortunada de recibir fondos cuando lo hizo porque los Grunts probablemente habrían dejado de trabajar, o solicitado una enmienda del Fondo Grunt, si sus contribuciones hubieran seguido perdiendo valor.

Además de los problemas de contribución de los Grunts, el capital de Egon impidío que la compañía creciera. Las demandas de la compañía se expandieron y Egon necesitaba adquirir más capital humano. Idealmente, Egon quería traer a otro Grunt; sin embargo, no podía traer un nuevo Grunt sin lastimar a los Grunts en su conjunto. Un nuevo Grunt significaría que cinco Grunts, no cuatro, estarían dividiendo el 61% del capital de la compañía, como máximo. Basándose en el egoísmo inicial de Egon, ahora debe elegir entre el crecimiento de la compañía y la moral de los Grunts.

  1. Posibles consecuencias comerciales
    1. Responsabilidad legal por actuar de mala fe
    2. Caracterización de los empleados
    3. Daño irreparable para mantener el equipo en el futuro

Los líderes de los Grunts que alteran el modelo de fondo grunt para aislar porciones significativas de capital de la participación en el Fondo potencialmente se exponen a responsabilidad legal. Cuando un Líder Grunt confiere beneficios a expensas de los Grunts, un tribunal puede exigir al Líder Grunt que haga una restitución a los Grunts para evitar un enriquecimiento injusto del Grunt Leader.

Las alteraciones al modelo del Fondo de los Grunts que hacen que la relación Grunt Leader-Grunt se caracterice como una relación empleador-empleado puede ser una violacion de la ley laboral. La falta de pago del salario mínimo y las horas extraordinarias son las violaciones más probables a las que se enfrenta un líder de los Grunts en estas circunstancias. Las sanciones por estas violaciones incluyen: pagos atrasados, daños liquidados, multas de $1,000 por cada violación y honorarios de abogados y costos judiciales.

En resumen, el modelo del Fondo de los Grunts fomenta la creación de equipos saludables y la colaboración a través de los principios de equidad incorporados en el modelo. Cuando el Líder de los Grunts se reserva grandes porciones de capital para sí mismo, compensa injustamente al Líder a la expensa de los Grunts. Este desequilibrio erosiona la moral del equipo y crea los mismos problemas que el modelo del Fondo de los Grunts se busca evitar, es decir, el conflicto entre los fundadores sobre las divisiones de capital. Este conflicto tiene el potencial de destruir el desarrollo de la compañía y/o causar un colapso del negocio por completo.

Starting a Business Aged 50 Plus

Setting up a business when you are older can seem like a crazy idea. Friends and family might even tell you that. But there are some real pros to being an older person and setting up a business, as long as you have the dedication to keep going with it. Here we will give you the lowdown on starting a business aged fifty plus.

That One Big Idea

If you have that one big idea that you have been considering for years, why not just go for it? Chances are your idea is brilliant and people will love it. Make sure to check that someone else hasn’t beat you to it. Also don’t worry if they have, adapt it a little give it a new spin and see what you can come up with. It is likely if you have had that idea in your head for many years, it is a good one and what is the harm in giving it a go?

Get Help

A great way to be as savvy as possible is to get some external help you can trust. Come at it from a business perspective. Do not just employ your niece as she made a great PowerPoint once, ensure that you are getting professional help. When it comes to business you know your strengths, but it can be difficult to see your own weaknesses, especially if you don’t know what you are meant to be strong or weak at! On freelancer sites like Fiverr and UpWork, you can hire freelancers to help you write a business plan. This is a great start. Ensure you read over their reviews before entering a contract. You can also get mentored with online business support and coaching, which can be very helpful for new entrepreneurs.

DIY Business

Once you have a plan and know where you are going, you can start to look around for free to use resources to help you set up your business. A brilliant example of this is to create your logo. A business logo does not need to come from an expensive designer nowadays but can come from an online logo creator tool just as easily and without the hefty price tag.

Social networks are a must-have for new businesses. Sign up to them and fill your pages with your branding. There are many socials that when you sign up to them as a business that you can use for free to market yourself to your chosen demographic.

Starting a business when you are fifty plus is a great chance to renew your life, live your dreams and enjoy yourself. It’s also a great way to earn more money before you retire. However, it does not always work out so make sure you are cautious while having fun and don’t invest too much money before you know it is already working!

Should My Company Issue Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR)?

Why Should I Offer Stock Appreciation Rights?

Two of the most common benefit plans companies offer their employees are employee stock option plans (ESOP) and stock appreciation rights (SAR). While both have unique benefits, for the employer and its employees, there are differences and financial considerations that must be addressed before choosing the right benefit incentive plan for your company. Whichever plan you choose, each method motivates employees to increase shareholder wealth and offers compensation for their hard work and commitment. In this article, we will focus on SAR. Read our article on ESOP to compare options and follow up with business startup expert, attorney, Matthew Rossetti. 

In the know – key terms

  • Grant date is the date that the employer and employee agree to the terms and conditions of a stock option, or equity-based award. Once agreed upon the stock appreciation right is granted to the employee and the date is recorded as such. The grant date also determines the exercise price.
  • Vesting date is the date an employee is eligible to exercise a specific number of options. Typically, starting on the date of vesting to the ending on the SAR’s expiration date, a vested SAR may be exercised, in whole or partially. Prior to this date, no payout will be granted. Note, exercising your rights may be dependent on how long an employee works for the company, employee performance, or based on the overall performance of the company.
  • Expiration date refers to the last day an employee can exercise stock appreciation rights, and only if the market price exceeds the exercise price. However, if the SAR’s market price is below the exercise price, the shares are worth nothing and can never be exercised. Furthermore, If the terms and conditions of the bonus agreement are not met by this date, the employee will lose the SAR.
  • Exercise price is the market price of the stock on the grant date, and the price an employee is able to purchase shares, once options are vested. There is also an exercise period, which is the time in between the vested rights and the expiration date, wherein the employee may exercise their appreciation rights. 

Unpacking SARs

Offering a SAR is a great benefits plan for startups, especially if you are an S-Corp, LLC, partnership, or other business entity that is unable to award stock. A SAR allows a business to reward its employees without exhausting any cash reserves or giving up any equity and they can usually fund the rights through the organization’s payroll system.

Stock appreciation rights are essentially a bonus – usually paid out in cash, sometimes stock, or a combination of the two – to a company’s employees. These bonuses are issued with a grant date, an exercise price, a vesting date, and an expiration date. This type of benefit plan enables an employee to cash-in on appreciating stock prices, after a specified vesting period, between the grant date and the exercise date. However, this payout is only accomplished if the employer’s stock price rises. 

Planning is key

The ability to create a customized benefits plan, structured for the betterment of a business and its employees, is what makes SARs a popular option amongst many businesses looking to incentivize their employees. Depending on how a company is set up, employers have a lot of flexibility when planning because there are few to no restrictions. 

  • Employers have the ability to offer their employees options to exercise their SAR when they choose to.
  • Vesting schedules provide a performance-based retention tool, structured in a way that bonuses are only paid out if an employee lives up to the original terms and conditions agreed to on the grant date. 
  • Predetermined plans can be agreed upon as to what an employee will receive if he/she resigns or is terminated, if anything at all.
  • Non-compete clauses can be implemented into the employer/employee agreement in order to ensure employee loyalty.  
  • Employers can further incentivize top performers by offering some of the net proceeds if the company is sold.
  • Companies that already have an ESOP in place can offer SAR as an additional incentive for its employees.
Caveat

While stock appreciation rights do have their advantages, such as tax deductions for corporations, and no upfront cost to employees to exercise rights, there are a few things to understand in advance. 

  • An employer is required to withhold taxes, either by withholding cash or shares.
  • Publicly traded companies may require shareholder approval when issuing stock appreciation rights.
  • A company may need to follow retirement plan rules if it wishes to cover all employees and offer benefits after termination.
  • Employees will not receive dividends or voting rights.
  • Upon exercising rights, employees must report any income on the fair market value of the amount of the right received at vesting – even if it is a share and is not sold.
  • If employees receive cash upon the sale of the company, it will be taxed as ordinary income tax

When planning, many decisions must be made carefully and strategically. Employers must consider vesting rules, liquidity concerns, eligibility, rights to interim distributions of earnings, tax implications and so much more. It is always advisable to discuss any plan to issue SARs with a knowledgeable attorney. Sentient Law is here to assist you.

Is An ESOP Right For My Company?

Win-win

An Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), is the most popular form of employee ownership in the U.S. ESOPs helps businesses establish a transition plan by creating a market for their company’s stock. This method of ownership transfer or sale can be a sound strategic move for business owners to ease the burden of retirement and to sell in a way that is advantageous for tax purposes. The benefits of an ESOP are not mutually exclusive, it is also a great way to spread the wealth amongst dedicated employees and promotes an ownership culture within a company, making this a win-win benefit plan. After all, giving employees a sense of ownership can make them feel like an important part of the company, incentivizing them to work harder and fostering loyalty and productivity.

The implementation of an ESOP can be extremely complicated, Matthew Rossetti is an expert in this area of practice and will confidently guide you through the process. Let’s take a deeper look into it to determine if an ESOP is the best option for your company.

ESOP simplified

Stock options give employees the opportunity to own parts of the company they work for. In an employee stock option plan a company sets up a trust and this trust can acquire, hold, and sell the company’s stock. An ESOP (employee stock ownership or employee share ownership) is a kind of employee benefit plan offered by employers. In most cases, ESOPs are a contribution made from the company to the employee, rather than an employee purchase. It is a defined-contribution (employees do not pay income tax on the amount contributed by their employer until they withdraw money from the plan) similar to profit-sharing or a 401(k) employee benefit retirement plan. Company shares are allocated to individual employees’ accounts annually. Upon retirement, disability, termination, or death the employer must buy back the stock at fair market value from the employee unless there is a public market for the shares. 

With an ESOP an owner of a company can sell parts or all of its shares and continue to maintain control of the company and its business operations. It is important to note, while this plan is referred to as employee stock ownership, the employees don’t actually own stock in the company. The ESOP is an organized retirement account, held by a trustee for the benefit of the employee. That person, or trust company, will negotiate a closing deal on behalf of the employees and hold the sold stock in trust. Although employees have an ownership stake in the company, they don’t actually have a right to vote the shares, to elect the board of directors, or any say as to how the company should or will be operated. When the employees retire, then, they reap the rewards and get a payment based on what the shares are worth.

Why is it advantageous to an employer?

Choosing to sell a business to an ESOP requires much consideration for a business owner. While establishing an ESOP has its advantages, an ESOP is not the proper course of action for all corporations, and particular entity formations do not meet the requirements for this type of employee benefit plan. For example, an S corporation and a C Corporation have the ability to establish an ESOP. However, an LLC is not permitted to have an ESOP because it does not have stock, it has memberships or units, therefore it can not offer ESOP stock options. That being said, an LLC that is taxed as an S corporation does qualify for an ESOP. Rather than stock, the unit shares will have the same rights to distribution, dividends, and liquidation proceeds.

For those companies that do qualify and opt for an employee stock option plan, there are substantial tax advantages. Not only is it a tax-exempt trust, transferring to an ESOP allows a business owner to defer or bypass capital gains taxes. Moreover, contributions of stock and cash are tax-deductible, and when an ESOP is used to borrow money both the loan repayments and interest are tax-deductible. The benefits of an ESOP will vary depending on the type of entity a business owner chooses for their company. Many companies choose to convert LLC taxed partnerships into an LLC taxed as a corporation, S corporations into C corporations, and C corporations into S corporations after having more clarity as to the benefits of each. A popular choice of entity selection for businesses aiming to offer an ESOP is choosing an S corporation, due to its significant tax advantages.

If the ESOP holds shares in an S corporation, the earnings from the ESOP shares are not taxable. Furthermore, an S corporation can avoid tax distributions all together and hold on to the cash in the company, for reinvestment into the business, if the ESOP owns 100 percent of the company. This is because S corps don’t pay tax on their profits, their profits and losses are passed through to their shareholders based on the percentage of their ownership. If an ESOP owns the company, there is no federal tax due because the ESOP is in a trust, which is tax exempt, allowing companies to retain more of its earnings. With the increase of cash flow, corporations are able to quickly reduce debt, enhance employee benefits, and have funds for greater capital investments and acquisitions. This is a huge tax advantage for S corporations. Do keep in mind,  Any changes that are to be made to your business entity should be done after consulting a qualified attorney, due to possible adverse consequences.